Community members air concerns about plans to use Justice Park as a parking lot for Justice HS
Justice High School PE students use the basketball court at Justice Park. |
Fairfax County Public School and Park Authority officials have yet to explain to residents the process involved in their plans to pave a section of Justice Park to create a parking lot for Justice High School in Seven Corners.
Community members expressed their frustration about that during a March 11 listening session hosted by Fairfax County School Board Chair Ricardy Anderson (Mason District).
The parking lot is part of FCPS’s design for building a much-needed addition for Justice High School. The school doesn’t have any excess land so the addition would take up part of the school’s parking lot.
As a result, the basketball court at Justice Park would be relocated to make room for a parking lot with 60 to 70 spaces.
One of the biggest complaints among residents is the lack of community engagement. People said they were not informed about the parking lot and weren’t given an opportunity to comment.
About half of Justice Park is overgrown with invasive plants. |
Several people complained that when the proposed addition was discussed at a Justice High School PTSA meeting the previous evening, FCPS officials left immediately after their presentation, before people had a chance to ask questions.
The parks and schools “have done nothing to reach out to our community,” said Kathleen Brown, the parent of a Justice student. [A letter to nearby property owners about the addition from BC Consultants doesn’t mention Justice Park.]
Related story: Plan to turn park space into parking lot angers residents
“This is not the way to make us feel our opinions are valued,” Brown said. “This cannot be done by a secret handshake” between FCPS and the Park Authority.”
“They say it is not a done deal,” said Whitney Redding of the Friends of Holmes Run group, but the plans for the addition are moving along. “It’s really hard to have questions until we know the process. What is the process and where does the public fit in?”
Residents are getting a runaround, with the Park Authority telling people to ask FCPS and vice versa, said Carol Turner, a resident of Ravenwood Park. “We don’t get a feeling that someone is in charge.”
“We are worried about losing any part of the park, especially for a parking lot,” Turner said.
“Adding insult to injury, all the things that were supposed to be in the park, we aren’t getting. Instead, they’re taking two acres away,” she said. The Master Plan approved in 2009 called for a network of trails connecting the eastern and western halves of the park and a garden area.
If the basketball court is relocated, the open play space would be lost. |
Only half of the 17-acre park is usable. The rest is covered with a tangle of vegetation. Many nearby residents don’t even know that area is parkland.
“That park is an undiscovered jewel that could be an amazing resource,” Turner said. It’s in a densely populated area of Seven Corners, with many apartments nearby and very little green space.
Ann Bennett raised concerns about the integrity of the Justice Park Master Plan. Master plans for parks are developed with community input and are supposed to guide future improvements. Any changes require an amendment to the master plan.
Kathleen Brown brought up the “park sovereignty issue,” stating that if the Park Authority gives up parkland here, “any other park is fair game.”
“This is our park. We pay taxes,” Brown said. “Parks are a community resource. This is what makes the community desirable.”
The Ravenwood Park Citizens Association passed a resolution opposing a plan to shrink Justice Park, noted resident Mark Doehnert. Any attempt to eliminate parkland should go through the county’s Comprehensive Plan amendment process, he said.
Several people mentioned One Fairfax, noting that preserving the park would further Fairfax County’s goal to promote equity.
Other residents noted the park is adjacent to a Resource Protection Area, that paving more areas would exacerbate stormwater runoff, and that the land was once owned by African American families who were descendants of slaves.
PTSA President Barbara Burgess noted there was a community meeting in December but neither the principal nor PTSA were informed of that meeting.
Burgess is concerned that if the parking issue is not resolved, the addition might be stalled. The addition is sorely needed, as the school is overcrowded.
She urged county and school leaders to find another way to provide parking “without a vast intrusion into the park.”
The outdoor classroom at Justice Park. |
Anderson agreed that the addition is needed and that alternatives to eliminating park space should be considered. Also, she said, the public needs to be better informed about the process and the timeline, and “we need to ensure we have robust community engagement.”
While the public officials at the meeting were invited to listen and not respond to the public’s concerns, they did have a few closing comments. Heather Diez, assistant director of design and construction at FCPS, said, “We are partners with the Park Authority and are working to be a good neighbor with the community.”
“Parks are very important to us,” said Sara Baldwin, deputy director of park operations at the Park Authority. “Want to work with you to protect as much of the park as we can while being good partners with the schools.”
Unbelievable so many procedural steps were omitted or overlooked. Kudos to the citizens who spoke up to protect the green space and parks. Too often passive parkland is seen as a commodity to be exploited instead of the environmental and natural resources that they are. I appreciate that Ms. Whitney Redding, Friends of Holmes Run Park, getting the word out to alert yet another environmental oversight has occurred. Thanks to the PTA reps, parents of Justice High students, and other community leaders and spokespersons speaking out. And the Annandale blog for providing the communications portal.
Thanks for speaking up. There is a solution that protects our remaining green space and wildlife.
This sounds typical for FCPS when it comes to the High School formerly know as JEB Stuart, pushing through things without community input. Can you explain why the school needs an expansion after a total renovation less that 10 years ago?
I would like to know when they are going to renovate Falls Church High School.
I wish that it was surprising, but the way in which his matter is being handled is all too familiar in this part of the county.
Time and again, the community is half informed, informed when things are already too far in process for input to be meaningful, or finds things out on its own. It is as unsurprising as it is disappointing; it is yet another example of the arrogance of power without, or fearful of, public accountability.
To wit: I live near the school, and the letter we received about the renovations and additions conveniently had NOTHING in it about the "proposed" parking lot at the park. It's no accident that the FCPS officials left the meeting when they did. And that so little information has been made available. And note the conditional language used concerning public input: "may," "need," etc.
This is not the first time that FCPS has charged forward with whatever it wants, regardless of anything the community has to say. The school name change itself is an example: the first poll of residents, students and alumni was against changing it. But that result was inconvenient, and the process proceeded anyway. To the School Board, the public was also incorrect concerning the new name that had the most support in the subsequent vote, and they chose something they preferred.
And there has been further expensive nonsense. The chain link fence that was recently installed on the perimeter of the property is something that many in the community find ugly. And it's also ineffective. It's for security, we are told; unfortunately, the school NEVER EVER locks the gates that are there that could also close off the parking lot entrances — which renders the fence totally useless as a security device. It does effectively trap garbage, however.
The renovation of the school 20 or so years ago took over an open space at the edge of the park as a staging area. The field was not restored to its former state and is overgrown.
Although overgrowth in the park is something that the Park Authority has long tolerated. Significant areas are choked with vines; whole mature trees are engulfed and overwhelmed. Fifteen years ago when I was an officer on the board of a nearby neighborhood association, during a site visit with a Park Authority official, what seemed to me to be a common sense request to have a huge stand of poison ivy near playground equipment removed was dismissed out of hand because poison ivy is native and therefore desirable, we were told. Invasive vines are indeed being removed now, and that is thanks to the ongoing efforts by dogged neighborhood volunteers for the last 15 years.
So neglect and selective improvements to the park are unfortunately part of its story. And now, oddly, more impermeable surface will be created there near a stream. The county has put controls in place regarding the amount of homeowners' front yards that can be paved, but new pavement like this at this location is just fine.
And yes, the County Comprehensive Plan may need to be amended. But as we have learned over the years, that is hardly a problem. It is done with regularity. The plan is as solid as a slice of warm swiss cheese.
Apparently the Park Authority representative from our area considers the proposal a "win-win." Not disappointing, because it is not surprising. Tone deaf, yes. Convenient, yes. Responsive to the public? Well, who would know?