Jimenez vows to fight for continuing vacuum leaf service
Mason District Supervisor Andres Jimenez told the audience at the Budget Town Hall he hosted on March 28 that he is working to ensure the county will continue vacuum leaf service.
Fairfax County collects leaves for only about 25,000 households, but the vast majority of them are in Mason District.
Last July, the Department of Public Works and Environmental Services called for the Board of Supervisors to end the vacuum leaf collection service after the 2023-24 season but then agreed to hold off for at least another year.
Jimenez said he will “fight strongly to keep the leaf collection.” He expressed concerns about illegal leaf burning and pedestrian safety when people are forced to walk in the street to avoid leaf piles on the curb, and said, “I plan to be very vocal on this.”
Related story: County backs off plan to eliminate vacuum leaf service next year
In a briefing on the advertised budget for FY 2025, Phil Hagen, director of the Department of Management and Budget, said the biggest funding increases would go to the schools and to county employee compensation.
Surprisingly, no one at the town hall complained about increased taxes.
A proposed 4-cent increase in the real estate tax rate would bring in about $225 million. If approved, homeowners would be charged $1.135 per $100 of assessed values, resulting in an increase in the average tax bill of just over $542. Average assessments, meanwhile, rose by 2.6 percent in Mason District.
When the Board of Supervisors adopts a final budget for 2025, it can approve a lower tax rate but cannot go higher.
Due to budgetary challenges, Hagen said, the budget would provide a $165 million increase in operating funds for Fairfax County Public Schools, which is much less than the $254 million increase requested by FCPS. There is a chance an increase in state funding could make up for at least part of the balance.
Even though enrollment is holding steady, more funds are needed because there’s a big increase in students needing more expensive special services.
Related story: Proposed county budget would raise taxes
The budget would increase funds for county employee compensation by $148 million, which takes into account increased retirement contribution rates and the need to accommodate collective bargaining agreements.
A proposed $12 million increase for transportation includes $10 million to support Metro operations and $2 million to accommodate the agreement following the strike by Fairfax County Connector employees.
Among the additional costs, the advertised budget would add four Park Authority positions, five new positions for managing affordable housing, two positions in the Office of Elections, and four new probation counselors. It would preserve 72 early childhood slots.
In addition to the increase in the tax rate, the budget proposes additional revenue increases by raising the cigarette tax (generating $1.3 million) raising building and other fees ($2.7 million). Another $36 million would be saved by eliminating 34 positions and improving efficiencies.
In response to a question from a teacher about options for diversifying revenue sources, particularly by imposing a tax on restaurant meals, Jimenez said, the Board of Supervisors should look at a meals tax and a hotel tax.
“I agree we need to look at different revenue streams. We need to lobby for more state funds, and we need to brainstorm on ways to diversify,” he said.
Susan Goncarovs of the Lincolnia Senior Center Advisory Council asked why the budget would raise the annual fee from $48 to $75 for county residents and from $100 to $150 for non-county residents.
For some people who come to the center, $50 is a week’s worth of groceries, Goncarovs said, and because the Lincolnia Senior Center is close to the Alexandria border, a large number of users are from outside the county. As most of the instructors are volunteers, there’s no justification for raising the fees, she said.
Jimenez agreed that the membership increase is “not fair” and promised to look into it, noting that seniors have fixed incomes. “All the voices in Mason District are extremely important to me,” he said.
In response to a question about the need to improve transportation and pedestrian safety, County Executive Bryan Hill encouraged residents to explore the new Mobility and Transportation Data Dashboard to see statistics on crashes, pedestrian improvements, and related issues.
Jimenez noted that his next town hall, to be scheduled in May, will focus on transportation and pedestrian safety projects.
Related story: Big increases proposed for building and zoning fees
One member of the audience called for increasing compensation for teachers, while another pointed out the big disparity between the salaries of entry-level teachers (less than $60,000) and highly paid administrators, some of whom earn more than $250,000 a year.
Jimenez said compensation is also a big issue for police and fire department personnel, many of whom can’t afford to live in Fairfax County. He met one employee at the Annandale Fire Station who commutes from Delaware. “It’s a quality-of-life issue, if people are worried about paying rent and traveling an hour and a-half to get to work,” he said.
Other residents urged the county to fund tree rescue and tree planting efforts and do a better job enforcing signage and other code violations, noting that it’s currently a complaint-driven process. Code compliance staff can’t do anything unless a resident files a complaint.
Hill noted that the county’s Operation Stream Shield program uses residents of homeless shelters to remove illegal signs from roadways.
Jimenez urged residents to reach out to his office with additional feedback on budget priorities, adding, “We’re here to listen.”
Residents can submit comments on the budget by texting FY25Budget to 73224; sending an email to [email protected]; calling 703-890-5898, code 1379; and testifying at a public hearing in person, by phone, or by video. To speak at the hearing, sign up online.
Hearings on the budget are scheduled for April 16-18. The Board of Supervisors will mark up a budget on April 30 and adopt a final budget on May 7. The School Board will adopt a budget on May 23. The budget year begins July 1.
Keep leaf collection. And, I just noticed in my recent property tax bill that I’m being charged over $10,000 for that “service”. Between property assessment and tax rate increases, it makes staying in my home town increasingly difficult.
Schools suck-up way too much funding, but apparently the county didn’t accede to all their wishes; I highly doubt any “Administration” is worth $250,000.
Finally, Fairfax needs to insist more of our state tax money comes back to us.
Unless I missed something, last fall’s leaf collection program consisted of two visits by the vacuum truck separated by at least a month. That’s hardly dedicated service.
Moreover, Mr. Jimenez’s comment about “look[ing] at a meals tax….” seems disingenuous. The NOVA Democratic delegation in Richmond practically guaranteed the eventual adoption of a meals tax when its members successfully proposed legislation to abolish the statutory requirement for such a tax to be subject to approval by referendum. It appears unlikely that the Democrats on the Fairfax County BOS didn’t play a part in this.
As you’ll remember, Fairfax County voters has previously rejected a meal’s tax in three consecutive referendums. Needless to say, that contemptuous disregard for voter opinion sums up the Democrats’ attitude toward anyone who interferes with their tax and spend agenda – Sparky
Thank you Ellie for the nice article, thank you to our county officials for the all services we receive, and thank you Norm and Sparky for your comments.
For 2023, the countywide average home assessment was $723,825. The current leaf collection assessed rate is $0.012 per $100 of a property’s assessed value. So, on the average 2023 assessed property, the leaf amount would be $86.86. I’m assuming Norm the over $10,000 is your total for real estate, infestation prevention tax, leaf collection fee, storm water tax, and refuse fee, and that’s about right for a property assessed at over $800,000.
The FY 2025 advertised budget shows the leaf rate going from $0.012 to $0.019 per $100 of a property’s assessed value, by my calculations a 58% increase. With the increase in property values to $744,526 for 2024 and a 2025 budget rate of $0.019 per $100, that takes it to an average of $141.46.
When I divided the 2023 reported leaf Expenditures of $3,202,887 by 24,703 leaf customers, I got an average $129.66 per leaf property customer. County Executive Hill seemed to say it costs more even than that.
When we looked into Arlington County and City of Falls Church costs per customer, we found per property customer amounts significantly below Fairfax County’s -like about $35 for Arlington and maybe $50 to $65 for Falls Church.
.
Sparky, the county says three pickups per year, they said they did 3 for the 2023-2024 season, and they apparently contract some of this work out. So, even if there were no leaves or not many on round 3, I assume the county and thus we fee payers are paying for the contract costs and county work. Arlington County does two pickups per year and says they use forestry science advice and data to help predict the best times for pickup.
So, hopefully the Fairfax County 2025 budget process can result in some improvements for county leaf customers to bring the costs down and back down and maybe look at Arlington and reduce to two pickups and use forest science to better predict when, reducing costs and thereby improving efficiencies too. And then continue with capital improvements in equipment used for the service, so the future years leaf $ rates can stay reasonable and competitive.
It’s also apparent that recycling / reuse of leaves on our property is preferable when possible, and I sense it will require time (measured in years) and effort to show more residents why and how to recycle leaves onsite. Maybe the county can ask Virginia Tech to do some research and give us advice. However, it is also apparent that we have properties that generate more leaves than the property can handle, whereby the county service is and continues to be a great and necessary benefit. We were also told all the leaves collected are redistributed, so that is another plus.
Code compliance changed from “complaint driven” to just plain enforcement would help make the county cleaner and less junky. They need to start in Mason District. Junk cars litter many of the yards, enforcement goes out (if someone complains) and all the people do is put a tarp over the car. Really, perhaps require them to get the cars licensed, insured and paying property tax on them and the cars will either leave or be brought up to normal operating standards. It is ridiculous, that a compliance officer can go to one house and respond to a complaint but the person in the next house has the same issue and they have to turn a blind eye to their compliance issue.
Plus, restaurants are charging more for less food now. What would a meals tax do except to discourage more people from dining out?