Fairfax County supports LGBTQ+ residents
Fairfax County has earned the highest score possible on the Human Rights Campaign’s Municipal Equality Index, a measure of support for LGBTQ+ residents.
The county received the top score of 100 on the index, which rates cities and counties on how inclusive their policies and services are for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer people.
The index considers such factors as non-discrimination laws in employment, housing, and city contracting; services provided to LGBTQ+ youths, seniors, and people experiencing homelessness; a police department liaison to the LGBTQ+ community; and public positions on equality.
Related story: Celebration of Acceptance offers mental health resources to LGBTQ youths
“Our repeated top score is a reflection of the critical work we continue to achieve for all residents with our One Fairfax policy, and with the strong support of the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors,” said County Executive Bryan Hill. “Together, our staff are dedicated to ensuring Fairfax County is a place where everyone belongs.”
Fairfax County also scored 100 on the Municipal Equality Index in 2022 and 2023. The county wasn’t rated in 2024.
The 2025 report acknowledges that many anti-LGBTQ+ state laws enacted around the country in recent years have negated or overrode some of the positive efforts made by cities and counties, especially with regard to inclusive healthcare policies for transgender employees.
Nevertheless, many local leaders are stepping up “even when anti-LGBTQ+ extremists in state capitals are working to undermine their progress,” the report states. “This year’s Municipal Equality Index shows the results of their dedication, while acknowledging the increasingly hostile environment in which they must govern.”
Related story: Police liaison to build relationships with LGBTQ community
Wonderful! A community that is affirming and accepting of all residents and not just some. Stand strong FFXC! The trolls will come and go but #lovewins forever.
Lovewins until you ruin children’s’ lives, cause the next AIDS, and burn in Hell.
Trying to use AIDS as proof of something wrong about LGBTQ+ people is ridiculous if you look at all the other diseases that strike absolutely anyone, such as cancer, covid, the bubonic plague, etc.
It is important that, as an apparently Christian person, you recognize your malicious ignorance and bigotry (both of which hurt children more than you know), not to mention your arrogance, especially in light of your belief in hell. I suggest you pray for the grace that you deny so many others.
Love is love.
People are people.
Peace and healing to all.
Cool tagline that is demonstrably disproven with two seconds of brainstorming.
Love isn’t love. Example: NAMBLA.
People aren’t people. Example: Hitler.
Peace and healing to some, not all. Example: unrepentant murderers, rapists.
I was not claiming that those phrases are absolute, and you (should) know it. Back under your bridge, troll.
Hell doesn’t exist. Stop being so puritanical.
Maybe read your Bible
I have no interest in joining your book club. It’s full of inconsistencies. Have a day.
Makes sense since hell apparently does not exist.
Prove it does. I’ll wait.
Seems like we need an extra #Lovewins for this one.
You’re entitled to your repulsive opinion but the data means the majority in this county don’t agree with your rhetoric, which I am thankful for! Carry on, troll.
This is awesome!
It seems we’re emphasizing recognition for identity-based attributes while overlooking basic civic virtues. I’m not sure that’s a healthy direction.
Could you elaborate on that?
Arthur,
I agree. Picking winners and losers based on immutable attributes is economically inefficient, ethically repugnant, politically unsustainable, and culturally divisive. I am a mixed race female… and am sick of being told where I belong and who I am by the social justice people. My (black) mother always taught me “equal playing field” which is the opposite of equity, especially in practice in the schools and workforce today.
Fairness collapses when “inclusion” rules override equal treatment. Too often, the loudest champions of inclusivity use it as a bully pulpit, imposing their beliefs while silencing any dissent.
This is evident in the euphemisms used by the architects of identity-based ideology: equity, social justice, diversity and inclusion, culturally responsive teaching. These terms mask an ideology that would be far harder to sell under its true nature. “Equity” sounds benign, yet it stands in direct opposition to the American ideal of equality, the principle affirmed in the Declaration of Independence, defended in the Civil War, and codified in the 14th and 15th Amendments and the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts.
These architects openly reject equality as “mere nondiscrimination,” claiming it is camouflage for oppression. In their framework, equality is not a virtue but an obstacle to be replaced with engineered group outcomes.
And in recent years, government has pressured citizens to accept these contradictions as fairness. They aren’t.
I dream of a day when people are judged by the content of their character rather than the pronoun they expect us to use.
And I’m sure black people back then dreamed of days when they would be judged by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin.
Same with LGBTQ people wanting to be accepted rather than judged based on their sexuality.
And I’m not the type that cares for pronouns and other more recent trends/labels.